October 18, 2020 Caesar for now, God is forever

Twenty-ninth Sunday in Ordinary Time 

 

In today’s first reading, God speaks to Cyrus through the prophet Isaiah.  This passage shows that God can use us even if we know God or not.  Whether we convert to any religion or not.  Through Isaiah, God uses the phrase, “though you knew me not” denoting that Cyrus is not a member of the Jewish religion.  Later in the passage, the phrase, “Though you know me not”, is used which indicates that Cyrus has had no conversion experience.  Regardless of this, God has anointed him to be the instrument through which the exiles are released and allowed to go home.  The message for us is that God uses us and has a job for each of us, though we know it not.

Today’s second reading is a pep talk to the Thessalonians.  Paul is encouraging them to keep up their works of faith and labors of love and to endure in hope, assuring them of his prayers as well as the prayers of his companions, Silvanus, and Timothy.  This passage models for us how we are to be, to and for, each other.  We should encourage and pray for each other as we continue to labour in love and hope.  This passage almost serves as a corrective model to the Pharisees way of being expressed in today’s gospel.

The Herodians were supporters of Herod, who was loyal to Rome it was the Romans that he owed his kingship.  According to Josephus,  the Sadducees opposed him but he was favoured by the Pharisees, whom Herod in turn treated favorably.  In today’s Gospel, the Pharisees and the Herodians were in favour of paying the census tax.  Zealots, on the other hand, refused to pay this tax. “The land of Palestine belonged to God.  God gave it to Israel. No other nation had a right to it. A head tax levied by Rome was utterly abhorrent.”[1] 

The question, “Is it lawful to pay the census tax to Caesar or not?”, was meant to put Jesus in a lose/lose/lose position.  If Jesus was silent on the question, they would have reproached him, as not being the honest, faithful, frank, and open man, they pretended to take him to be.  Had he said that it was lawful to give tribute to Caesar, which was contrary to public opinion, they would have used that to set the people against him.  Had he affirmed it was not lawful to do it, they could expose him as a tax resister, a position that would ensure that he would be judged and condemned him, according to the Roman laws.[2]  The answer given by Jesus transcends the mentality of his questioners.

Willard Swartley, suggests of the Pharisees use of the term “Is it lawful” in this and other passages in the New Testament suggest three thing: 1) the Pharisees were committed to their law above everything else, 2) they planned to use the power of their law against Jesus on a very sensitive issue, and 3) they knew that the tax question was so politically volatile that if Jesus hedged in any way in his response, they would have a case for the cross.  Of the take-aways for us, two stood out for me.  First, we must not allow ourselves to take the Pharisees' side in making law the sole judge of moral obligation.  Secondly, we should see clearly that Jesus' answer does not tell us to give Caesar whatever he asks for.[3]

While Jesus answer seems to be saying obey Caesar and obey God, there are times when one has to disobey the law of Caesar in order to obey God’s law.  In our local context, take the case of the Water and Land Defenders who disobey government laws in order to protect lands and waters from further devastation.  Swartley, uses the example of conscientious objectors to war and those who refuse to pay war taxes to illustrate the point.  He states,

The crucial instruction that this insight gives us in our day is that we must be willing to be understood by others in a less favorable, more revolutionary way than we understand ourselves. In our relationships to political authorities, this is a difficult matter. Whether in conscientious objection to war or war tax resistance, we must accept the liability that political forces will brand both our resistance and nonresistance as revolutionary. But it might well be that such discrepancy between their perception and our self-understanding is the critical test of our faithfulness to the ethic of Jesus.

In closing, let us pray that we remember to render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s and to God that which is God’s. Grant us the strength, fortitude, wisdom, trust, and faith to cease acting out of fear and accept the responsibility to act out of love.


[1] Swartely, Willard (2020). “Answering the Pharisees: Tax to Caesar”. Sojourners. Accessed 2020-10-13 from https://sojo.net/preaching-the-word/answering-pharisees

 

[3] Swartely, Willard (2020). “Answering the Pharisees: Tax to Caesar”. Sojourners. Accessed 2020-10-13 from https://sojo.net/preaching-the-word/answering-pharisees

 

 

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2023-06-04_Trinity Sunday_Pride Month

Image
Trinity Sunday_Pride Month June 4, 2023   Today is the Feast of the Holy Trinity.   June is both Pride Month and Indigenous Peoples Month in Canada.   Today, I used one of the bible translations accepted by the English-speaking Church because I want to share with you how word choice can limit inclusive and creative thought.   Due to the patriarchal culture of the time, God is addressed as Adonai or Lord in speaking to God, with only the first letter capitalized, as is used by Moses’ prayer in the first reading.   The word LORD in all caps is used six times in today’s first reading.   The name of God used most often in the Hebrew Bible when speaking of God is the Tetragrammaton , romanized as YHWH .   However, the Jewish people traditionally do not pronounce it, and instead refer to God as HaShem , literally "the Name".   This conveys that God cannot be reduced to a “he/him” or a “she/her”.   The culture of our time allows for the use of non-gendered, all-encompassing wo
Read more

7 July 2013 – 14th Sunday in Ordinary Time

Image
Shared Homily Starter First Reading: Isaiah 66.10-14 Responsorial Psalm: Psalm 62 Second Reading: Galatians 6:14-18 Gospel: Luke 10.1-12, [13-16], 17-20 Today’s gospel is about evangelization.   The word, “evangelization” has become, for many of us, a word that sends up red flags.   This is because, unfortunately, for almost two millennia, evangelization has been used more as a weapon than as an invitation to follow Christ’s example of peace and love.   Let’s examine evangelization from Jesus’ perspective.   He knows there are plenty of people out there who would be open to hearing the Good News.   He also knows that there are plenty who don’t want to hear it.   But Jesus sends out his disciples like lambs into a sea of wolves.   We live in a culture of ravenous consumption and accumulation.   We seek to accumulate more and more money, more and more power and more and more ad nauseam.   The more we have, the more we want and more we have to get; the more we get t
Read more

The High Cost of Free Trade for Indigenous and Afro-Colombians

Image
Victoria Marie, PhD Presented at the Racial Violence and the Colour Line of the New World Order Conference Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia April 2, 2005 The power of spreading the word… When governments speak they don’t speak the truth. Plan Colombia is not addressing social probems but spending more on war, which seems to have the aim of eliminating the civilian population (OFP, 2004) . Introduction Colombia has been in a state of civil war for the past 40 years. The combatants are the legitimately armed actors, such as the army and police; paramilitaries, who protect the interests of legal and illegal businesses; and two major groups of revolutionary forces. However, it is the civilian population that is most adversely impacted from the ongoing conflict. They are endangered by the warring factions, who routinely murder, displace or conscript them. The aim of this paper is to explore how this conflict and economic policies have adversely affected the people of colour in Col
Read more