4th Sunday of Advent - Year A

 December 18th, 2022

 

In a video segment we watched for last Thursday’s Advent Lectionary discussions, one of the presenters mentioned that there are two approaches to scripture: the historical critical method and the theological.  He stated that we should look at today’s readings with the theological lens.  However, I feel that we do scripture, and the theological lessons scripture provides when we discard the historical critical input.  I will return to this point at the end of this reflection but for now, let’s look at Matthew’s version of events.

In Matthew’s infancy narrative, Joseph is the primary character. Like his namesake in Genesis chapter 37, he receives messages in dreams and must make decisions based on these messages.  (In Luke, it is Mary who receives a divine message and must choose.)

Joseph, presented by Matthew as “a just man,” will not subject Mary to a public divorce.  Instead, he decides to terminate the marriage quietly.

Joseph’s decision here models the sophisticated observance of the Torah that Matthew desires of all the members of his strongly Jewish church.  They are to observe “the smallest part of a letter” of the Torah (Mt. 5:17-19) as taught but with mercy as the most important principle of applying the law as authoritatively taught by Jesus in Matthew’s gospel. 

Now, Joseph knows that he has not slept with Mary.  She must have cheated on him, right?  Custom required Joseph to publicly divorce Mary for cheating, for him to expose her ‘wickedness’ to the community.   For Joseph, to not divorce her was to invite the harshest insults and embarrassment upon himself—and on Mary.  To publicly divorce Mary would have meant Joseph’s reputation could have been almost wiped clean.  He would have even walked away with some money.  Who wouldn’t have stuck to law and order?  Preserve your reputation, financial status, and the status quo.  This is the way of revenge!

But the angel has told Joseph in a dream that the pregnancy is through the agency of the Holy Spirit.  Joseph is instructed to name the child Jesus.  Joseph does as the angel instructed.  Naming the child by Joseph has significance in law.  It makes Joseph the legal father of Jesus.  It affirms that Jesus is a descendant of the house David, which is so important in Matthew’s genealogy.  But more importantly for us, Joseph becomes a role model for an important theme throughout Matthew’s gospel, that is, that following the Law or Torah includes love and mercy.  He echoes Hosea 6.6 “For I desire steadfast love and not sacrifice, the knowledge of God rather than burnt-offerings”, twice in his Gospel, first in Matthew 9.13 “Go and learn what this means, ““I desire mercy, not sacrifice.” For I have come to call not the righteous but sinners” and again in Matthew 12.7, “But if you had known what this means, “I desire mercy and not sacrifice”, you would not have condemned the guiltless.”

Joseph refuses to abandon Mary and Jesus to be torn to pieces by society.  To refuse to abandon Mary is to show mercy.  Through the story of this young, poor family, from an oppressed community, comes the embodiment of mercy.  The affirmation that God will restore us.

Let’s now look at the historical critical look at Matthew as he quotes Isaiah 7:14 to identify the child to be born to a virgin as Emmanuel (“God is with us”).

During the time of Isaiah, Israel and it’s King, Ahaz, are under threat.  An invading army is a threat to a mother to be in the household of Ahaz and Ahaz, an insecure king, is a threat to the life of the infant as he is known to have sacrificed one of his sons previously.  In Matthew, a pregnant Mary is under threat and at the mercy of her honourable but merciful and just betrothed.  The maniacal king, Herod, is a threat to the child Jesus and we know he tries to murder the infant Jesus.  Both Isaiah and Matthew signal that God has put the endangered pregnancy under his personal protection.  Both see the survival of the baby as a sign that God is with his people.

Matthew quotes the Greek Septuagint version of Isaiah 7:14 to identify the child to be born to a virgin as Emmanuel (“God is with us”).  This saying forms a “book-end” with the closing words of Matthew’s Gospel.  The resurrected Jesus says, “I am with you always, until the end of the age” (28:20).  The historical critical lens adds to the theological interpretation in that God was with us then, now, and always.  For Matthew God’s promise to always be with the people of God has achieved its ultimate realization both in the birth of Jesus and in the presence of the resurrected Jesus in the People of God.

 

Please share your thoughts.

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Homily on Mark 6:14-29 - for July 15, 2012

Image
God’s Voice Will Not Be Silenced Speaking Truth to Power This reading tells me that there are consequences to speaking truth to power, often deadly consequences.   But, God’s voice will not be silenced.    We are told that John spoke against King Herod’s marriage to his brother’s wife, Herodias.   Herodias was not too pleased about this negative publicity.   So she bides her time.   She uses Herod’s hastily spoken promise to her daughter to silence John once and for all. But God’s voice will not be silenced.   We are told in the stories just before this that Jesus was rejected in his own home town of Nazareth.   Jesus left Nazareth but he was not deterred by this rejection.   He sent the twelve out two by two and Jesus and his disciples carried on God’s call to repentance when John no longer could.   Speaking truth to power continues to have devastating consequences.   In 2004, I went on a women’s del...
Read more

7 July 2013 – 14th Sunday in Ordinary Time

Image
Shared Homily Starter First Reading: Isaiah 66.10-14 Responsorial Psalm: Psalm 62 Second Reading: Galatians 6:14-18 Gospel: Luke 10.1-12, [13-16], 17-20 Today’s gospel is about evangelization.   The word, “evangelization” has become, for many of us, a word that sends up red flags.   This is because, unfortunately, for almost two millennia, evangelization has been used more as a weapon than as an invitation to follow Christ’s example of peace and love.   Let’s examine evangelization from Jesus’ perspective.   He knows there are plenty of people out there who would be open to hearing the Good News.   He also knows that there are plenty who don’t want to hear it.   But Jesus sends out his disciples like lambs into a sea of wolves.   We live in a culture of ravenous consumption and accumulation.   We seek to accumulate more and more money, more and more power and more and more ad nauseam.   The more we have, the more we wan...
Read more

24TH SUNDAY IN ORDINARY TIME

Image
15 September 2013 – Shared Homily Starter First Reading: Exodus 32.7-11, 13-14 Second Reading: 1 Timothy 1.12-17 Gospel: Luke 15.1-32 When I pondered this week’s readings, a theme began to emerge.   Before I delve into the theme, I’d like you to consider a quote from Thomas Berry.   He said, “[O]ne of the basic difficulties of the modern West is its division into a secular scientific community, which is concerned with creative energies, and a religious community, which is concerned with redemptive energies.   So concerned are we with redemptive healing that once healed, we look only to be more healed.   We seldom get to our functional role within the creative intentions of the universe” (Berry 1988:25). When I considered this and looked at the readings again, I saw that what we need to be is not only co-creators but co-redemptors.   For example, in our first reading, have God’s promises to Noah and to Abraham been committed to forgetfu...
Read more